SPIE
My SPIE Subscription | My E-mail Alerts | My Article Collections
  Home » Proc. of SPIE » Volume 5370
 Search Proceedings
Advanced Search
 Browse Proceedings
Proceedings
By Year
By Symposium
By Volume No.
By Volume Title
By Technology
 Browse Journals
Journals
Optical Engineering
J. Electronic
   Imaging
J. Biomedical Optics
J. Micro/
   Nanolithography,
   MEMS, and MOEMS
J. Applied Remote
   Sensing
J. Nanophotonics
  SPIE Reviews
  SPIE Letters Virtual Journal
 Subscriptions &
 Pricing
Institutions &
Corporations
Personal subscriptions
 General Information
About the Digital
Library
Terms of Use
SPIE Home
Previous Article
A fast n-dimensional nonlinear filter
In this communication, we propose an original approach for the diffusion paradigm in image processing. Our starting point is the iterative resolution of partial differentialequations (PDE) according t...

You are not logged in to this journal. Log in

Optical coherence tomography: interpretation artifacts and new algorithm

Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5370, 2140 (2004); doi:10.1117/12.535857

Online Publication Date: 16 June 2004

Conference Date: Monday 16 February 2004
Conference Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Conference Title: Medical Imaging 2004: Image Processing
Conference Chairs: J. Michael Fitzpatrick, Milan Sonka
Dirk-Uwe G. Bartsch, Xing Gong, Cathy Ly, and William R. Freeman
UCSD Shiley Eye Ctr. (USA)
Purpose: To study the frequency and severity of artifacts in optical Coherence tomography images and to develop a new algorithm for improved retinal thickness detection.Methods: We propose a new method to measure the retinal thickness in OCT scans. We compared our modified edge detection (MED) method to the Markov method and the conventional OCT algorithm (cOCT) in 226 OCT macular scans.Results: We defined errors as a difference in detected interface location of less than 100 µm offset for less than 10 A-scans, otherwise it was an artifact. The frequency of errors was reduced from 32% (cOCT) to less than 2% with the MED method, while the Markov method had a frequency of 5%. Artifacts were reduced from 9.3% (cOCT) to 0.9% (MED) while the Markov method had a frequency of 11.5%.Conclusion: The results show the MED method of detecting retinal thickness is superior to the other two methods, since the OCT method is prone to both errors and artifacts and the Markov method is robust only to healthy retina. Our MED method is robust for detection of normal retinas and effective even in eyes with pathological conditions. Use of improved retinal thickness detection algorithm should significantly improve clinical utility of the optical coherence tomograph.

©2004 COPYRIGHT SPIE--The International Society for Optical Engineering. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Buy This PDF  (US$18)
Download PDF (2882 kB) View Cart

PROCEEDINGS DATA

ISSN:
0277-786X (print)  
Publisher:
AIP is a member of CrossRef SPIE


There are no references.

CITING ARTICLES


For access to citing articles, you need to log in.
For access to citing articles, you need to Log in.